National Security vs. Academic Freedom: Dutch Universities Navigate Delicate Balance

Growing Security Concerns Lead Dutch Universities to Tighten Screening of Foreign Researchers

The era of global academic exchange is facing challenges. Once, knowledge flowed freely across borders, but growing geopolitical tensions are now hindering international collaboration. Security concerns and policies have begun to affect student exchange programs, with some barriers being implemented. A clear example of this trend is observed in Dutch universities, which have recently become stricter regarding international cooperation in academia.

Dutch universities have implemented rigorous measures to safeguard sensitive knowledge and advanced technologies. According to a survey conducted by NOS, numerous international collaborations and applications from foreign researchers have been rejected based on recommendations from specialized advisory teams. These teams, tasked with preventing the misuse of critical resources, emphasize protecting Dutch academic institutions from undue influence by foreign powers such as China, Russia, and Iran. Their efforts also aim to shield students from potential coercion while maintaining a firm commitment to upholding human rights in the evaluation of partnerships and collaborations.

In 2022, these security measures were reinforced following warnings from the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV) about threats posed by foreign powers, especially China. The NCTV had underscored the vulnerability of Dutch companies, institutions, and scientists to large-scale digital attacks aimed at stealing advanced technological resources. Moreover, specific Dutch institutions have adopted rigorous practices for risk assessment. For instance, TU Delft evaluates approximately 700 cases annually, rejecting around 15%, while Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e) denies nearly 30% of applications. Certain approvals are granted conditionally, requiring researchers to remove sensitive information before visiting high-risk countries.

The advisory teams conduct these assessments based on limited information provided by foreign candidates. They consider several factors, including the sensitivity of the applicant’s field, applicable sanctions, and potential military or human rights implications. However, these institutions are currently prohibited from conducting detailed screenings of foreign researchers.

In light of this limitation, the Ministry of Education is drafting a bill that would empower Justis to perform comprehensive screenings of foreign researchers. Minister Eppo Bruins intends for these screenings to have binding outcomes, ensuring that individuals who fail the screening process would be deemed ineligible for employment at Dutch universities. These measures reflect the Dutch commitment to securing their academic and technological domains while upholding human rights and mitigating risks associated with foreign interference.

Editor’s Note:

The focus on national security in Dutch universities is necessary but challenging. Protecting sensitive knowledge, especially in fields with military or human rights risks, is crucial. However, it’s important to balance security with academic freedom and open collaboration. Rejecting international partnerships may limit the exchange of ideas and innovation that universities thrive on. The proposed bill allowing Justis to screen foreign researchers raises concerns about privacy and fairness. While security is important, it’s vital to avoid unfairly targeting groups based on nationality or research field.

Skoobuzz underlines that as the Ministry of Education moves forward, it must ensure transparency and safeguards to protect researchers' rights while maintaining security. If managed carefully, these measures can improve safety without compromising the inclusive nature of universities.