Yale Reinstates SAT/ACT Requirement Amid Equity Debate in College Admissions

Yale's Reinstatement of SAT/ACT Requirement Sparks Debate on Equity in College Admissions

Yale University adopted a test-optional policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it has been announced that applicants are again required to submit SAT or ACT scores. It is a similar move to Dartmouth College’s recent decision. It aims to increase access for underprivileged students, however, it has sparked criticism from advocates. The policy allows the applicants to submit alternate scores such as; from advanced placement or international baccalaureate exams. Yale has provided data that this decision will help students coming from low-income backgrounds and minority groups. On the other hand, critics argue that standardised tests worsen the existing inequalities.

Jeremiah Quinlan, the Dean of Undergraduate Admissions has defended their decision. He stated that test scores could help students from disadvantaged backgrounds display their capabilities. He stressed the role of standardized test scores, which are the predictors of future academic performance. Critics stand firm on the fact that standardised testing reinforces systemic biases and hinders marginalized communities. They argue that the SAT and ACT are historically rooted in exclusionary practices. They will continue to be an obstacle for students of lower socio-economic status and underrepresented minorities.

This debate regarding standardized tests in college admissions has intensified after the Supreme Court decided to restrict affirmative action. Yale asserts that the reinstated requirement will enhance diversity, on the other hand, its opponents caution against its potential to deter talented students from applying. Despite this controversy, Yale remains firm in its decision while underlining the complexities that surround equity and access in higher education admissions.

Editor's Note: 

The recent decision by Yale University to reinstate the SAT/ACT requirement for admissions has reignited a longstanding debate surrounding equity in college admissions. While Yale contends that requiring test scores could enhance access for underprivileged students, critics raise concerns about the potential exacerbation of existing disparities. This decision reflects broader discussions within higher education about the efficacy and fairness of standardized testing in shaping student demographics and academic opportunities. As universities navigate these complexities, they must carefully consider the implications of their admission policies on access, diversity, and inclusion within their student bodies.